Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Hamze v. Cardinal et al
as 3:2015cv01310
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Hamze
Defendant:
Cardinal, E.E. Rhoden, Alfred C. Box and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley et al v. Mr. Greenfield MD, PHD et al
as 3:2015cv01280
Plaintiff:
James Clifton Bradley and Third Regional Attorney's At Law for Defendant's Repertation General Counsel's Attorney's At Law
Defendant:
Mr. Greenfield MD, PHD, H. W. Priest, Diane Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MELENDEZ v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2015cv00450
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOWER MELENDEZ
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON HEALTHCARE PROVIDER, M NICHOLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARMON v. ANDREWS
as 1:2015cv00163
Petitioner:
JAMES HARMON, III
Respondent:
DIANE ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ford v. Hayes et al
as 3:2015cv00907
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Ford
Defendant:
Christopher Hayes, David Alford, Nancy Heiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Andrews et al
as 3:2015cv00854
Petitioner:
Tyrone L. Smith
Respondent:
Diane Andrews and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Horne v. Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00634
Plaintiff:
Mickey Horne
Defendant:
Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections, Diane Andrews, Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Medical Staff et al
as 3:2015cv00543
Plaintiff:
Malcolm J Marshall, Sr
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Diane Andrews, S. B. Rossiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITTON v. JONES
as 4:2015cv00200
Petitioner:
GARY RICHARD WHITTON
Respondent:
JULIE L JONES and DIANE ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
O'Connor v. Scarlett et al
as 3:2015cv00410
Plaintiff:
Nyka O'Connor
Defendant:
Gary Scarlett, Reddish, Julia Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
