Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cawthorne v. Scott et al
as 8:2012cv01004
Plaintiff:
Craig Close Cawthorne
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Pam Bondi, Diane R. James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAWTHORNE v. JAMES et al
as 4:2012cv00214
Plaintiff:
CRAIG CLOSE CAWTHORNE
Defendant:
DIANE R JAMES, DAVID E WILKINS, LOUBETH R FINAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cawthorne v. James et al
as 8:2012cv00921
Plaintiff:
Craig Close Cawthorne
Defendant:
Diane R. James, David E. Wilkins, Loubeth R. Finan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cawthorne v. Gee et al
as 8:2012cv00743
Plaintiff:
Craig Close Cawthorne
Defendant:
Diane R. James, David E. Wilkins, Secretary, Department of Childrens and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Scullock, II v. Diane James, et al
as 11-11316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE ARTHUR SCULLOCK, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DIANE R. JAMES, Administrator Director, RASIK PATEL, Psychiatrist MD, FLORIDA STATE MENTAL HOSPITAL and others
Willie Scullock, II v. Diane R. James, et al
as 10-11053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE ARTHUR SCULLOCK, II
Defendant - Appellee:
RASIK PATEL, Psychiatrist MD, ANITE K. ROBINGSTON, Registered Nurse, MICHAEL SNOWDEN, Security Officer Supervisor and others
RICHEY v. JAMES
as 5:2008cv00226
Plaintiff:
JIMMY R RICHEY
Defendant:
DIANE R JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTS v. JAMES
as 4:2008cv00137
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY MARTS
Defendant:
DIANE R JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scullock v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2008cv00298
Plaintiff:
Willie Arthur Scullock, II
Defendant:
Mark R. Wolfe, Charline Latour, Diane R. James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCULLOCK v. JAMES
as 4:2008cv00045
Plaintiff:
WILLIE ARTHUR SCULLOCK, II
Defendant:
DIANE R JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
