Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Holladay v. Sabatka-Rine
as 4:2012cv03139
Petitioner:
Larry Thomas Holladay
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Diane Sabatka-Rine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruffin v. Nebraska Dept. of Corrections et al
as 4:2012cv03058
Defendant:
Dr. S. Bruhn, Dr. E. Cambell, Robert P. Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Killingsworth v. Sabatka-Rine et al
as 4:2011cv03222
Respondent:
Robert Houston and Diane Sabatka-Rine
Petitioner:
David L. Killingsworth
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Sabatka-Rine et al
as 4:2011cv03215
Defendant:
Randy Bartells, Cockrell, Michael Edison and others
Plaintiff:
Harold B. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ebert v. Hargreaves et al
as 4:2011cv03139
Defendant:
Fred Britten, Kim Doht, Christina Ferguson and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ebert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Zuck v. Diane Sabatka-Rine, et al
as 11-2547
Petitioner - Appellant:
William W. Zuck
Respondent - Appellee:
Diane Sabatka-Rine, Warden and Robert P. Houston, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Decoteau v. Sabatka-Rine
as 4:2008cv03146
Petitioner:
Christopher L. Decoteau
Respondent:
Diane Sabatka-Rine
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gibbens v. Laymen et al
as 4:2007cv03246
Plaintiff:
Leanord L. Gibbens
Defendant:
Lewis B. Laymen, Mitchell L. Marsh and Diane Sabatka-Rine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
