Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Pauletta v. Diehl et al
as 1:2023cv01759
Plaintiff:
Robert Pauletta
Defendant:
Craig Diehl, James Helt, Barry Dillman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Redclift v. Schuylkill County et al
as 4:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Sean Redclift
Defendant:
Schuylkill County, Schuylkill County Prison Board, Eugene Berdanier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv02175
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
TAVERNA v. PALMER TOWNSHIP et al
as 5:2020cv00812
Defendant:
MR. DILLMAN, TUSKES HOMES, PALMER TOWNSHIP and others
Plaintiff:
PHILIP J. TAVERNA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HEAGY v. CUMRU TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2017cv04394
Plaintiff:
TYLER T. HEAGY
Defendant:
CUMRU TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, ALFREDO ORTIZ, SCOTT S. SCHMITTINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillman v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00551
Plaintiff:
Marilin E. Dillman
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc., Honda Motor Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Konscler v. Schuylkill County et al
as 3:2015cv00588
Plaintiff:
Sherry Konscler
Defendant:
Schuylkill County , Schuylkill County Prison Board , Eugene Berdanier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Adams County Domestic Relations et al
as 1:2014cv02074
Plaintiff:
Terry Harris
Defendant:
Adams County Domestic Relations, William Gold, Susan Gantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lark v. Dillman et al
as 1:2013cv00335
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Lark
Defendant:
Dillman , Bennings , Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
