Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Blevins v. Arora et al
as 5:2024cv02954
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Blevins
Defendant:
Nikesh Arora, Nir Zuk, Aparna Bawa and others
Schwarz v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02492
Plaintiff:
Paulina Afshani Schwarz
Defendant:
Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Nikesh Arora, Dipak Golechha and others
Silva et al v. Arora et al
as 3:2024cv02350
Plaintiff:
Nathan Silva and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Defendant:
Nikesh Arora, Nir Zuk, Aparna Bawa and others
Dipak Patel v. Hero, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02959
Plaintiff:
Dipak Patel
Defendant:
Hero, LLC, Rahul Arya, Hitesh Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Schlaegel v. Palo Alto Networks Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Martin Schlaegel
Defendant:
Palo Alto Networks Inc., Nikesh Arora, Dipak Golechha and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv13207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Karmakar et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv09053
Plaintiff:
Dipak Lal Karmakar and Good Morning Deli & Grocery Corp.
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Agriculture and United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
