Cases
Jacob Peyton v. John Comb
as 15-6129
Plaintiff - Appellant: JACOB DOUGLAS PEYTON, IV
Defendant - Appellee: MAJOR JOHN C. COMBS, Head of Security at WRSP, SERGEANT NATHAN D. JACKSON and MICHAEL A. STEELE, K9 Officer
Defendant: HAROLD W. CLARK, Director Dept. of Corr., RANDALL MATHENA, Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison, MR. JEFF KISER, Asst. Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison and others
Supreme-El v. Director, Dept. of Corr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00302
Petitioner: Metaphyzic El-ectromagneti Supreme-El
Respondent: Director, Dept. of Corr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baxter v. Director, Dept. of Corr.
as 1:2011cv01259
Petitioner: Leon L. Baxter
Respondent: Director, Dept. of Corr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carroll v. Director, Dept. of Corr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00185
Petitioner: John Jay Carroll
Respondent: Director, Dept. of Corr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chatman v. Director, Dept. of Corr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00465
Petitioner: Rashad Montrell Chatman
Respondent: Director, Dept. of Corr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guerera-Sandoval v. Director, Dept. of Corr.
as 2:2009cv00238
Petitioner: Danilo Esteban Guerera-Sandoval
Respondent: Director, Dept. of Corr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guzman-Soto v. Director, Dept. of Corr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00388
Petitioner: Jose Fausto Guzman-Soto
Respondent: Director, Dept. of Corr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mack v. Director, Dept. of Corr.
as 2:2008cv00069
Petitioner: Otis Mack
Respondent: Director, Dept. of Corr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?