Cases 61 - 70 of 9,891
Butler v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00497
Petitioner:
Marcus Quin Butler
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rector, Jr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00181
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Rector, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carson v. State of Texas
as 4:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
Michael James Carson
Respondent:
State of Texas and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Matthew Thomas Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Anton Juel Henry
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Monroe v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00578
Petitioner:
Gregory Zachary Monroe
Respondent:
Warden and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00437
Petitioner:
James Antwone Acy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weatherly v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
Rohn Michael Weatherly
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00406
Petitioner:
Dralon Duran Patterson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunham v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Thomas Eugene Dunham
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
