Cases 1 - 10 of 23,713
Anderson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Travis Edward Anderson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Lumpkin
as 24-10419
Petitioner:
Marcus Quin Butler
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mousavi v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2024cv01775
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ali Mousavi
Defendant:
Director Alejandro N. Mayorkas, US ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND, Mr. Randy Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crawford v. Lumpkin
as 24-50371
Petitioner:
Avery B. Crawford
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mathews v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01755
Petitioner:
Mike Naoyuki Mathews
Respondent:
TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 24-40337
Petitioner:
Nicholas Nahrue Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01740
Plaintiff:
Andrew Garcia, Jr.
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rector v. Director, TDCJ
as 4:2024cv01741
Plaintiff:
Lonnie H Rector, Jr
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
