Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Kenneth Newkirk v. Director Department of Corrections
as 24-6341
Petitioner:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Respondent:
DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Kenneth Newkirk v. Director, Department of Corrections
as 24-6336
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Shuron Barksdale v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6289
Petitioner:
SHURON MAURICE BARKSDALE
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Department of Corrections
Ejonga-Deogracias v. Sinclair, et al.
as 24-1359
Plaintiff:
JOJO EJONGA-DEOGRACIAS
Defendant:
STEPHEN SINCLAIR, Secretary, Department of Corrections, MICHAEL OBENLAND, Superintendent, Monroe Correctional Complex, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON and others
Newkirk v. Director, Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Director, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Newkirk v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6056
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director Department of Corrections, LISA HERNANDEZ, WARDEN RICK WHITE and others
Kenneth Newkirk v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6057
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
HAROLD C. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director Department of Corrections
Kenneth Newkirk v. Director Department of Corrections
as 23-7181
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Respondent / Appellee:
DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Wayne Marshall v. Director Department of Corrections
as 23-6799
Petitioner / Appellant:
WAYNE RALPH MARSHALL
Respondent / Appellee:
DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Phillip Speers v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15533
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILLIP GREGORY SPEERS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry for the State of Arizona and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Arizona
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
