Cases 61 - 70 of 10,907
Cervantes v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00293
Petitioner:
Tony Cervantes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Joshua Lynn Stewart
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Joe Earl Smith
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rector v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00544
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Rector, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Contreras et al
as 7:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Brandon D. Dishman, Bryan D. Reitsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McWilliam v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Donald McWilliam
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hubert v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
Lawrence Israel Hubert
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McWilliam v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Donald McWilliam
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00497
Petitioner:
Marcus Quin Butler
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rector, Jr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00181
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Rector, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
