Cases 51 - 60 of 330
Starkey v. Collier
as 21-20083
Defendant / Appellee:
Khari Mott, Estelle Unit Medical Business Manager, Doctor Lannette Linthicum, Director of TDCJ Health Services Division, John Doe, University of Texas Medical Branch Correctional Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brock Andrew Starkey
Jones v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv03228
Plaintiff:
Leslie Jones
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis, Asst. Warden Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lomeli v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv02942
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis and Sr. Warden Blake Lamb
Plaintiff:
Enrique R Lomeli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles A Lott v. Abbott et al
as 4:2020cv02954
Defendant:
UTMB Health Department, Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Warden R Herrera and others
Plaintiff:
Charles A Lott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lumley v. Davis
as 4:2020cv02930
Plaintiff:
Jason Lumley
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Davis
as 3:2020cv00268
Petitioner:
Patrick Bernard Ingram
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Weatherly v. Davis
as 6:2020cv00054
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Rohn Michael Weatherly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kennemer v. Davis et al
as 3:2020cv00260
Defendant:
Major Chibuike Onwuka, Warden Patricia Demerson, Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
John David Kennemer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Davis
as 3:2020cv00202
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Richardson
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Davis
as 6:2020cv00043
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Richardson
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
