Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02177
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-56068
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07329
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23140
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55005
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02388
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv22553
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Bo Gao v. USCIS, et al
as 20-55616
Plaintiff / Appellant: BO GAO
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, DONALD NEUFELD, Associate Director of the California Service Center, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Claudia Rueda Vidal v. Andrew Bolton, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56232
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL BRIGHTMAN, in his individual capacity and ANDREW K. BOLTON, in his individual capacity
Defendant: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, LEE FRANCIS CISSNA, Director of USCIS, in his official capacity, U.S. BORDER PATROL and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: CLAUDIA SARAHI RUEDA VIDAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04049
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?