Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Kenneth Cooper v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6294
Petitioner:
KENNETH DWIGHT COOPER
Respondent:
HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Dept. of Corrections
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jowarski Nedd v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6526
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOWARSKI RUSSELL NEDD
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Dept of Corrections
John McKinnon v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6453
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN LAMONT MCKINNON
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Dept. of Corrections
Frank Reid v. Corizon Health Services
as 22-7377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK REID
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, VA Dept. of Corrections Contract Medical Provider, J. BLEDSOE, Red Onion State Prison Medical Administrator, DOCTOR FOX, Red Onion State Prison Physician and others
John McKinnon v. Harold Clarke
as 22-6666
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN LAMONT MCKINNON
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Dept. of Corrections and HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Dept. of Corrections
Abdul-Hasib Al-Musawwir v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6459
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Dept. of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
ABDUL-HASIB AL-MUSAWWIR
Hunter v. Director of the Dept. of Corrections
as 3:2021cv00132
Respondent:
Director of the Dept. of Corrections
Petitioner:
Markeith A. Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James King, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6429
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES DEWEY KING, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA Dept. of Corrections
Abdul Mu'Min v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6031
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Va. Dept. of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
ABDUL MU'MIN, f/k/a Travis J. Marron
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
