Cases 11 - 20 of 31
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Holtsberry et al
as 3:2010cv02278
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas R Holtsberry, Richard Watkins and Holtsberry Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Directv, Inc. v. Slogar et al
as 5:2010cv01839
Plaintiff:
Directv, Inc.
Defendant:
Ronald E Slogar and Loch Erie Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Bolognue et al
as 5:2010cv01052
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Bolognue and English Stick, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Herchenrader et al
as 3:2010cv00264
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
Dennis Herchenrader and Don and Den, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Boyd et al
as 1:2010cv00534
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
James G Boyd and Cornerstone Bar & Grill
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Violation of Illegal Interception of Cable System
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Belew et al
as 1:2009cv01158
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
Kyle D. Belew and Belew Entertainment Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 546 Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Amos et al
as 3:2009cv00795
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
Clifton W. Amos, Brian M. Hayden and CBD & T, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Lehnen et al
as 1:2009cv00886
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
Frank D. Lehnen, Jr. and Exit 86, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized reception of cable service
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Lokar et al
as 2:2009cv00789
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark C. Lokar and RPM Management Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Tabbaa et al
as 5:2009cv02092
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
Mohammad Tabbaa, Luna's Deli and Grille, Inc. and Lunas Deli & Grill
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Violation of Illegal Interception of Cable System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
