Cases 11 - 20 of 334
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. BLM, et al
as 11-15777
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SIERRA CLUB, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor-Defendant:
BLUERIBBON COALITION, CALIFORNIA ASSOC. OF 4 WHEEL DRIVE CLUBS, UNITED FOUR WHEEL DRIVE ASSOCIATIONS and others
Citizens Legal Enforcement and v. Robert Johnson, et al
as 11-55380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITIZENS LEGAL ENFORCEMENT AND RESTORATION, an unincorporated California nonprofit association
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON, Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary of the Interior, KATHLEEN CLARKE, Director of the Bureau of Land Management and others
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. US Fish & Wildlife Service et al
as 5:2009cv00090
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Northern San Jacinto Valley and San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society
Defendant:
Dirk Kempthorne and US Fish & Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Theodore Roosevelt Conservatio v. Kenneth Salazar
as 10-5386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership
Defendant - Appellee:
Dirk Kempthorne, In his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and United States Bureau of Land Management
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Questar Market Resources, Inc., Shell Rocky Mountain Production LLC and Ultra Resources, Inc.
Recent Past Preservation Netwo, et al v. John Latschar, et al
as 10-5181
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Recent Past Preservation Network, Dion Neutra and Christine Madrid French
Defendant - Appellant:
John Latschar, in his official capacity as Superintendent of Gettysburg National Military Park, Dennis Reidenbach, in his official capacity as Acting Director, Northeast Region of the National Park Service, Marie Bomar, in her official capacity as Director of the National Park Service and others
El Paso Natural Gas Company v. USA, et al
as 10-5090
Plaintiff - Appellee:
El Paso Natural Gas Company
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellant:
Navajo Nation
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Energy, Samuel W. Bodman and others
El Paso Natural Gas Company v. USA, et al
as 10-5080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
El Paso Natural Gas Company
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
Navajo Nation
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Energy, Samuel W. Bodman and others
County of Sacramento, et al v. Dorothy Andrews, et al
as 10-80062
Plaintiff - Respondent:
WILTON MIWOK RANCHERIA, a formerly federally-recognized Indian Tribe, Its Members, ME-WUK INDIAN COMMUNITY OF THE WILTON RANCHERIA and DOROTHY ANDREWS
Defendant - Respondent:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary of the Department of Interior, CARL J. ARTMAN, Assistant SEcretary of for Indian Affairs of the United States Department of Interior, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Petitioner:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA and CITY OF ELK GROVE, CALIFORNIA
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States, et al
as 10-3060
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary, United States Department of the Interior and GEORGE SKIBINE, Assistant Secretary of Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs
Me-Wuk Indian Community of the Wilton Rancheria et al v. Kempthorne et al
as 5:2007cv05706
Plaintiff:
Me-Wuk Indian Community of the Wilton Rancheria
Defendant:
Dirk Kempthorne , Carl J. Artman , United States Department of Interior and others
Intervenor_dft:
County of Sacramento, California and City of Elk Grove
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
