Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Ditech Financial LLC v. Stokes et al
as 2:2023cv05317
Plaintiff:
Ditech Financial LLC and Green Tree Servicing LLC
Defendant:
Gregory Stokes and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Ditech Financial LLC v. Pirozzi
as 7:2019cv07326
Plaintiff:
Ditech Financial LLC
Defendant:
Larry C Pirozzi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fc
White et al v. Ditech Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv05653
Defendant:
New Residential Mortgage, LLC, Federal National Mortgage Association, Bank of America N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Y. Michelle White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diggs v. Ditech Financial, LLC
as 1:2019cv04984
Plaintiff:
Varnel Diggs
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 tt
Ditech Financial LLC v. Pezzino
as 2:2019cv01854
Plaintiff:
Ditech Financial LLC and Green Tree Servicing LLC
Defendant:
Pietro Pezzino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Ditech Financial LLC v. Ragusa
as 2:2019cv01714
Plaintiff:
Ditech Financial LLC
Defendant:
Mark P. Ragusa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Ditech Financial LLC v. Moran
as 7:2019cv02264
Plaintiff:
Ditech Financial LLC
Defendant:
Dianne Moran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fc
Ditech Financial LLC v. Albin et al
as 2:2019cv01070
Plaintiff:
Ditech Financial LLC and Green Tree Servicing LLC
Defendant:
Linda B Albin, Nassau County Clerk, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Ditech Financial LLC v. Durdu
as 2:2019cv00977
Plaintiff:
Ditech Financial LLC and Green Tree Servicing LLC
Defendant:
Gulten Durdu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ditech Financial LLC v. Gilroy et al
as 7:2019cv01512
Plaintiff:
Ditech Financial LLC
Defendant:
Sherri L Gilroy, Synchrony Bank and Joseph T Gilroy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
