Cases 1 - 10 of 10
OBADO v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURTHOUSE et al
as 3:2022cv00823
Petitioner:
DENNIS OBADO
Respondent:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURTHOUSE, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv12196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv12197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSS v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 3:2017cv05846
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE , J.H. MORRIS , A. CASCIANO and others
Plaintiff:
PHILIP J. MOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv06931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. PALMIERI et al
as 2:2009cv06019
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
LUCY PALMIERI, HANOVER ASSOCIATES, LP, HANOVER ASSOCIATES, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. CONNOLLY et al
as 1:2009cv04624
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
MICHAEL CONNOLLY, DARLENE CONNOLLY, DEPT. OF TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
WILLIAMS v. RONKO DEVELOPERS, INC. et al
as 3:2007cv00796
Plaintiff:
THOMAS L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RONKO DEVELOPERS, INC., SUPERIOR COURT OF MONMOUTH COUNTY, SUPERIOR COURT APPELLATE DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
