Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Minnesota Office Plaza LLC v. Dlorah, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv05061
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Office Plaza LLC
Defendant:
Dlorah, Inc. a South Dakota Corporation doing business as National American University, Park West, LLC, Ronald Shape and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowman et al v. Dlorah, Inc., et al
as 4:2019cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jackquelynn Mortenson and Shayanne Bowman
Defendant:
Stacy J. Wilton, Tyree Smith, Dlorah, Inc., d/b/a National American University and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dlorah, Inc. v. KLE Construction, LLC
as 5:2016cv05102
Plaintiff:
Dlorah, Inc.
Defendant:
KLE Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pouncie et al v. Dlorah Inc
as 3:2015cv00511
Plaintiff:
Erica Pouncie , Lindsey Gonzales and Nichole Andrews-Coddington
Defendant:
Dlorah Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Lopez v. Dlorah, Inc.
as 5:2011cv01101
Plaintiff:
Rosita Lopez
Defendant:
Dlorah, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DePeralta v. Dlorah, Inc.
as 5:2011cv01102
Plaintiff:
Lorie DePeralta
Defendant:
Dlorah, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez v. Dlorah, Inc. d/b/a National American University
as 4:2011cv01101
Plaintiff:
Rosita Lopez
Defendant:
Dlorah, Inc. d/b/a National American University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DePeralta v. Dlorah, Inc. d/b/a National American University
as 4:2011cv01102
Plaintiff:
Lorie DePeralta
Defendant:
Dlorah, Inc. d/b/a National American University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd. et al v. Dlorah, Inc.
as 1:2010cv04001
Plaintiff:
Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd. , Nau Holdings, LLC and Horny Toad Activewear, Inc.
Defendant:
Dlorah, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Reynolds v. Dlorah, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00580
Plaintiff:
LaShaine Reynolds
Defendant:
Dlorah, Inc. , Douglas Stichler and Cammie Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
