Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Yves Maboneza v. Thieroy Henry, et al
as 20-1426
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR YOUNG and THIEROY HENRY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YVES M. MABONEZA
BAUGH v. DOES
as 1:2018cv00122
Plaintiff:
JAMES BAUGH
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, Ms. Powell, Doctor Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leon Robinson-Bey v. Victor Calloway, et al
as 17-3374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEON ROBINSON-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
VICTOR CALLOWAY, Warden, MELISSA D. BONEBRIGHT, Lieutenant, DOCTOR YOUNG and others
Fellon v. Lampert, et al
as 15-8016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH J. FELLON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT LAMPERT, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, in his individual and official capacities, STEVE HARGETT, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden, in his individual and official capacities, MELANIE MARTINEZ, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Health Service Administrator, in her individual and official capacities and others
Fellon v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Director et al
as 2:2014cv00100
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J Fellon
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Robert O Lampert, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Thompson et al
as 6:2011cv00007
Plaintiff:
David E. Jones
Defendant:
Danny Thompson, Wayne Johnson, Doctor Taylor and others
Counter_claimant:
Jeffrey Gunderson
Counter_defendant:
David E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooker v. Thompson et al
as 6:2010cv00078
Plaintiff:
Reginald L Hooker
Defendant:
Dannie Thompson, Deputy Warden Johnson, Medical Director Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Battle et al
as 5:2009cv00323
Plaintiff:
Nelson Henry James
Defendant:
Ralph Battle, Leslie G Walter, Bostick State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
