Cases 1 - 10 of 40
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. doing business as ALASKA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
GALEN OF FLORIDA, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
COLUMBIA PLAZA MEDICAL CENTER OF FORT WORTH SUBSIDIARY, L.P. doing business as MEDICAL CITY FORT WORTH formerly known as PLAZA MEDICAL CENTER OF FORT WORTH, GALEN OF FLORIDA, INC. doing business as HCA FLORIDA ST. PETERSBURG HOSPITAL, BAY AREA HEALTHCARE GROUP, LTD. doing business as CORPUS CHRISTI MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv03085
Plaintiff:
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. doing business as ALASKA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv02904
Plaintiff:
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. doing business as ALASKA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
CONWAY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv01250
Plaintiff:
SOUTH TEXAS HEALTH SYSTEM, NORTHWEST TEXAS HOSPITAL, TEXOMA MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
WEST FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. et al v. AZAR
as 1:2021cv00004
Plaintiff:
COLUMBIA PLAZA MEDICAL CENTER OF FORT WORTH SUBSIDIARY, L.P. doing business as MEDICAL CITY FORT WORTH formerly known as PLAZA MEDICAL CENTER OF FORT WORTH, COLUMBIA HOSPITAL AT MEDICAL CITY DALLAS SUBSIDIARY, L.P. doing business as MEDICAL CITY DALLAS, COLISEUM MEDICAL CENTER, LLC doing business as COLISEUM MEDICAL CENTERS and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II and NORRIS COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv03828
Plaintiff:
LANCASTER HOSPITAL CORPORATION doing business as PALMDALE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER also known as LANCASTER HOSPITAL, HRI HOSPITAL, INC. doing business as HRI HOSPITAL also known as HUMAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE, UHS OF ANCHOR, L.P. doing business as SOUTHERN CRESCENT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM also known as ANCHOR HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
District Hospital Partners, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 20-5222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UHS-Corona, Inc., doing business as Corona Regional Medical Center, Lancaster Hospital Corporation, doing business as Lancaster Community Hospital, UHS of Oklahoma, Inc., doing business as St. Mary's Regional Medical Center and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv01097
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC., WELLINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, MCALLEN HOSPITALS, LP and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
SHULER v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2019cv02343
Plaintiff:
MCALLEN HOSPITAL, L.P., MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC., SARASOTA DOCTORS HOSPITAL, INC. and others
Petitioner:
LAMONT DERRICK SHULER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
