Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 71
DODDS v. RANSOM et al
as 2:2022cv01759
Petitioner: RICHARD M. DODDS
Respondent: KEVIN RANSOM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LIBERTY ELEVATOR EXPERTS, LLC et al v. CHONG
as 5:2022cv00664
Plaintiff: LIBERTY ELEVATOR EXPERTS, LLC, Mr. CHRISTOPHER M. DODDS and CHRISTOPHER M. DODDS
Defendant: Mr. ALBERT CHONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
DODD et al v. MERCK & CO INC et al
as 2:2020cv06355
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO INC
Plaintiff: GEORGE DODD and SHIRLEY DODD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv05004
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GILL v. STROUSE et al
as 5:2018cv03490
Defendant: ANNETTE STROUSE, JOSEPH EUGENE NAGY and LYNN A. STROUSE
Counter Defendant: JAMES DODD-O, THOMAS, THOMAS & HAFER, LLP, MICHAEL BISHOP and others
Plaintiff: MELISSA M. GILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DODDS v. VERDE ENERGY USA, INC.
as 2:2015cv04659
Plaintiff: JOE DODDS
Defendant: VERDE ENERGY USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
DODD v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv04374
Plaintiff: HEATHER DODD
Defendant: BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dodd v. DeRose We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01088
Plaintiff: Eric Alan Dodd
Defendant: Dominick DeRose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodd v. USA
as 1:2015cv00413
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: David Richard Dodd, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dodd v. USA
as 1:2015cv00414
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: David Richard Dodd, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?