Cases 1 - 10 of 418
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Meka, et al v. Haddad, et al
as 24-1425
Plaintiff:
ROHINI MEKA and SURESH CHIRUMAMILLA, individually and as father and next friend of PRANAV CHIRUMAMILLA
Defendant:
HANI HADDAD, VALLEY WOMEN'S HEALTH GROUP, LLC and JOHN/JANE DOE
Doe 3 v. Executive Office of the President, et al
as 24-1212
Plaintiff:
MS. JANE DOE 3
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, the White House and HONORABLE LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, the Secretary of Defense
Interested Party:
IAN REYES BUENAVENTURA
John Doe, et al v. City of Boston, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and JAMES DOE
Defendant:
BOSTON, MA, PAUL EVANS, individually, ROBERT DUNFORD, individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Leavitt v. United Services Automobile Association, et al
as 24-1115
Plaintiff:
ALLAN M. LEAVITT, Individually, and as Class Representative and JOHN DOE 1-100
Defendant:
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, a Texas Department of Insurance Regulated Reciprocal Inter-insurance Exchange and Subsidiary, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY and COMMERCE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Omori, et al v. Brandeis University
as 24-1084
Plaintiff:
ALAN THOMAS OMORI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LINFEI YANG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and JOHN DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
