Cases 1 - 10 of 244
Jareske v. Bennington Public School District et al
as 8:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Molly Jareske
Defendant:
Bennington Public School District, Satarah Reardon, Garet Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mitchell v. Ruff et al
as 4:2024cv03046
Plaintiff:
James T. Mitchell
Defendant:
Sergeant Devin Ruff, Deputy Roland Kramer and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barber v. Doe 1 et al
as 8:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
RaySean Barber
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stark v. City of Omaha, Nebraska et al
as 4:2023cv03242
Plaintiff:
Jack A. Stark
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Nebraska, Todd Schmaderer, Nicolas Yanez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyler v. Doe
as 8:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peak v. Doe et al
as 8:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Terrijana Peak
Defendant:
John Doe and Officer Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rosberg et al v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Rosberg, John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Paul A. Vaughn, James Kube and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. City of Omaha, Nebraska et al
as 8:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Thompson
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Nebraska, JOHN DOE 1-9 and John Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rosberg et al v. Johnson et al
as 8:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Rosberg, John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Mark Johnson and Robert Evnen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fitil v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Tosun Mahmud Fitil
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Omaha Police Chief Todd Schmaderer and Officers Jane or John Does 1 - 21
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
