Cases 1 - 10 of 15
USA v. Gentry
as 22-30138
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Timothy Gentry, also known as Johnny_5_is_@live, also known as John Doe, also known as John Doe #12
Labor Saving Systems Ltd. v. Does 1-79
as 4:2021cv01389
Not Classified By Court:
Does 1-79
Plaintiff:
LABOR SAVING SYSTEMS LTD d/b/a Magnepull, and Labor Saving Systems Ltd. doing business as Magnepull
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc, Doe 3 4:21-cv-1389 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Baylor UniversityIn re: Baylor University
as 21-50386
Respondent:
Jane Doe 14, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 11 and others
Petitioner:
In re: Baylor University
The Naughtys LLC v. Does 1-580
as 4:2021cv00492
Plaintiff:
The Naughtys LLC
Defendant:
Does 1-580, Doe 299, Doe 159 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
USA v. Timothy Gentry
as 18-30263
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY GENTRY, also known as Johnny_5_is@live, also known as John Doe, also known as John Doe #12
Mohammed Omran v. Robert Wyche, et al
as 18-30042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED AHMED HASSAN AB OMRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT WYCHE, STEVE PRATOR, ARDISE HICKS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00236
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UN4 Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al
as 4:2017cv01685
Plaintiff:
UN4 Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al
as 4:2017cv01212
Plaintiff:
ME2 Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al
as 4:2017cv01033
Plaintiff:
ME2 Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
