Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Everett et al v. Tram Chemicals, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv03451
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Everett , Mike Kowis , Michael James Kowis and others
Defendant:
Tram Chemicals, Inc., Walden Environmental Chemistries, Inc., Walden Performance Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv02977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al
as 15-40333
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Movant - Appellant:
JANE DOE #1, JANE DOE #2 and JANE DOE #3
Meneses v. Alaniz et al
as 7:2015mc00319
Plaintiff:
Joel Cardenas Meneses
Defendant:
Anibal Alaniz, Eduardo Lozano, Gabriel Gaytan and others
Griffin v. American Zurich Insurance Company et al
as 3:2014cv02470
Plaintiff:
Trent S Griffin, Sr
Defendant:
American Zurich Insurance Company, Walgreens Company , Greg Wasson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyles v. American Medical Collection Agency, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00010
Plaintiff:
Larry Lyles
Defendant:
American Medical Collection Agency, Inc., John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harter v. BP PLC et al
as 3:2013cv00337
Defendant:
BP P.L.C., John Doe 12, John Doe 13 and others
Plaintiff:
David Harter
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00218
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
