Cases 21 - 30 of 90
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00719
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anderson v. Worthington et al
as 0:2018cv00098
Defendant:
Justin Taylor, Belinda Moore, Michael Worthington and others
Plaintiff:
Arnold Ray Anderson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harrison v. Woolridge et al
as 3:2018cv00388
Plaintiff:
Salisa Luster Harrison
Defendant:
Rick Woolridge, Brian Tucker, Robert C. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Millhouse v. Jones et al
as 6:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
Kareem Millhouse
Defendant:
Rhonda Jones, Pamela Kenny, R. Cimorossa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nashville Pharmacy Services, LLC v. Empire Pharmacy Consultants L.L.C. et al
as 5:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
Nashville Pharmacy Services, LLC
Defendant:
Empire Pharmacy Consultants L.L.C. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Meeks v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 5:2017cv00224
Plaintiff:
Glenmore Meeks, Jr.
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astrazeneca LP, ABC Corporations, 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 5:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
Linda Roberts
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astra Zeneca LP, ABC Corporations, 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-10
as 3:2016cv00702
Plaintiff:
ME2 Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 050
Bell et al v. Paducah Bank and Trust Company, et al
as 5:2016cv00127
Plaintiff:
Dennis Bell and McCracken Builders, Property & Management, LLC
Defendant:
Paducah Bank and Trust Company, , John Ellis and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
