Cases 1 - 9 of 9
GRAY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
HERBERT GRAY
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, ESQ., PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE, INC. et al v. STATE UNIVERSITY RUTGERS et al
as 2:2021cv15333
Plaintiff:
CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE, INC., PETER CORDI, RAELYNNE MILLER and others
Defendant:
STATE UNIVERSITY RUTGERS, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY, RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
MORGAN v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00655
Plaintiff:
DENZEL MORGAN
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GIOVANNI NIEVES , MATTHEW CANTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv08779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LEE et al v. TMZ PRODUCTIONS INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00234
Plaintiff:
JANICE LEE , BON HYUB KOO , RYAN JUN-MO KOO and others
Defendant:
TMZ PRODUCTIONS INC., DAILY NEWS L.P., JOSEPH STEPANSKY and others
Consol_defendant:
DAILY MAIL, SEOUL NEWS, IMBC INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NIKE, INC. v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2014cv01353
Plaintiff:
NIKE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
NIKE, INC. v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2012cv02564
Plaintiff:
NIKE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
PATRICK COLLINS, INC. et al v. JOHN DOES 1-18
as 1:2012cv01452
Plaintiff:
PATRICK COLLINS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-18
Movant:
JOHN DOE 13
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
NIKE, INC. v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2010cv01908
Plaintiff:
NIKE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
