Cases 61 - 70 of 140
Winn v. Jane Doe #1 et al
as 1:2015cv01562
Plaintiff:
Antoine Winn
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, Calvin Williams, Cleveland Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Mohr et al
as 2:2015cv02460
Plaintiff:
Joshua Barrett
Defendant:
Gary C Mohr, Martinez, Ginn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ndoye v. Major Performance LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00380
Plaintiff:
Ndeye Ndoye
Defendant:
Major Performance LLC , Julie Majors , Westlake Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Long v. Mohr et al
as 2:2015cv01616
Plaintiff:
Mark M. Long
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Eddy, Elliott Neufeld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dresher v. Lucas County et al
as 3:2015cv00585
Defendant:
Lucas County , Lucas County Sheriff Deputy John Doe #1 , Lucas County Sheriff Deputy John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Dresher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Latham v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2014cv02326
Plaintiff:
Larry M. Latham, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Columbus, James Kirk, Shannon Schmid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendricks v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2014cv01890
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hendricks
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners, Frank Bova, Midwest Medical Staffing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fox v. Moore et al
as 3:2014cv01100
Plaintiff:
Camille Fox
Defendant:
Michael E. Moore , City of Toledo , Lucas County Board Of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss et al v. City of Solon et al
as 1:2013cv01931
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Moss and Marcella Mattox
Defendant:
City of Solon , Robert Bozak , Ross Faranda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruckman v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2013cv00814
Plaintiff:
David W Ruckman
Defendant:
Thomas C. Jenkins, Walker, (Jr) Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
