Cases 31 - 40 of 672
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEDRICK v. THE COUNTY OF SALEM et al
as 1:2022cv05143
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY NEDRICK
Defendant:
SALEM COUNTY, WARDEN JOHN S. CUZZUPE, THE COUNTY OF SALEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. BOROUGH OF FORT LEE et al
as 2:2022cv04788
Plaintiff:
MINDY COHEN
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF FORT LEE, HINTZE, BENDUL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
RIZVI v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 3:2022cv04471
Plaintiff:
AINA RIZVI
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., WATCHUNG PEDIATRICS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BROWN v. SALEM COUNTY et al
as 1:2022cv03739
Plaintiff:
Ashley Brown
Defendant:
SALEM COUNTY, JOHN S. CUZZUPE, THE COUNTY OF SALEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTHERFORD v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv03320
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RUTHERFORD
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARMIEL v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02813
Plaintiff:
BILHA CARMIEL
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
