Cases 1 - 10 of 49
United States of America v. Jane Doe I, et.al.
as 1:2022cv01853
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jane Doe I, and Jane Doe II,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Blankson v. ACMH Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04114
Plaintiff:
Kobe Adjei Blankson
Defendant:
ACMH Inc., Well Life Network, Human Resource Administration Public Assistance Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781 Forfeiture
Zuercher v. Hoskins et al
as 4:2021cv05142
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyne Zuercher
Defendant:
DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, Unknown FBI Agent 1, Janina M. Hoskins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SANCHEZ MALPICA v. United States Justice Department et al
as 1:2020cv23745
Plaintiff:
JUAN JOSE SANCHEZ MALPICA
Defendant:
United States Justice Department, Dir. Timothy J Shea, United States Of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JANE DOE
as 1:2020cv01377
Defendant:
JANE DOE
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DOE
as 3:2020cv06293
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
executor of t JEAN DOE
Robinson v. US Dept Justice US DEA et al
as 1:2019cv00459
Defendant:
Saratoga County DA Office, Saratoga County Sheriff Michael Zurlo, Saratoga County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Keisha Robinson
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Doron et al
as 1:2018cv24492
Defendant:
Harold Kramer, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DOE
as 1:2017cv02425
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
McGown v. Brady et al
as 1:2017cv08397
Plaintiff:
James McGown
Defendant:
Edward T. Brady, Nancy Brady, Suzanne Brady Caroline Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
