Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Franklin v. Frakes et al
as 8:2016cv00470
Defendant:
Fred Britten, Bruns, Busboom and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua G. Franklin, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
as 8:2016cv00403
Defendant:
Case Manager Alfred, John and Jane Does, Unit Manager Brad Extrom and others
Plaintiff:
Heath E. Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Frakes et al
as 8:2016cv00391
Defendant:
Margaret Antley, Fred Britten, Unknown Busboom and others
Plaintiff:
David M. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kosiski v. Frakes et al
as 8:2016cv00345
Defendant:
All John and Jane Does known and Unknown, Unknown Armkneckt, Teresa Bittinger and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Kosiski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. John Doe et al
as 8:2016cv00334
Defendant:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Ernest Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swift v. Lux et al
as 4:2016cv03081
Defendant:
Judge Coffy, Jon Doe, Foxoll and others
Plaintiff:
Arnetta Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lim v. US Marshals, et al
as 8:2016cv00254
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Eban Jones and others
Plaintiff:
John Dewey Lim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Nebr. Dept. of Corr. Srvcs. et al
as 8:2016cv00187
Defendant:
M. Antley, Scott Frakes, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Heath Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Frakes et al
as 8:2016cv00155
Defendant:
Scott Frakes, Hargreaves, John Does-1-15 and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon R. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swift v. Foxhall et al
as 8:2016cv00151
Defendant:
Foxhall and Unknown John Doe
Plaintiff:
Arnetta Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.