Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Lewis v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00608
Defendant:
Correctional Officer John Doe #2, Correctional Officer Edwards, Nurse Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon Jordan Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zeno v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00573
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Williams, Larry Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Zeno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newby v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2024cv01449
Defendant:
Doe #3, Jane Doe #1, Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Robbie Lynn Newby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Varner v. Leu et al
as 3:2024cv00566
Defendant:
Warden Leu, Captain Rosencrance, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Varner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Bowman v. Collins et al
as 7:2024cv00475
Defendant:
B. Steffey, Johnny Hall, Jordan Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Lowel Bowman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Leu et al
as 2:2024cv00430
Defendant:
Jane Doe 4, John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Hosea Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Tamaris (Gibraltar) Limited v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2024cv01026
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 8, John Doe 7 and others
Plaintiff:
TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Stone v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00428
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #4, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Eugene Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Rosch et al
as 7:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Keith Almarode, Melissa Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Demetrius D. Wallace
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Gregory Holloway, Rick White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
