Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Brady v. Associated Press Telecom
as 17-268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James H. Brady
Defendant - Appellee:
Associated Press Telecom, NBC News New York, WCBS-TV New York and others
Defendant:
John Doe, 1-50
In re: Aluminum Warehousing An
as 16-4305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Claridge Products and Equipment, Incorporated, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Custom Aluminum Products Incoroprated, Ampal Incorporated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Metro International Trade Services, L.L.C., Pacorini Metals USA, LLC, Henry Bath LLC and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Does 1-10, inclusive, Unidentified Parties and others
Eastman Kodak Company v. Goldman Sachs Group
as 16-4230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eastman Kodak Company, AGFA Corporation, AGFA Graphics NV and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Henry Bath LLC, Metro International Trade Services, L.L.C., JP Morgan Chase & Co. and others
Defendant:
Pacorini Metals AG, London Metal Exchange Limited, London Metal Exchange Limited and others
In Re: Martin S. Parness
as 16-4098
Petitioner:
Martin S. Parness
Respondent:
Hon. Chris Christie, Governor, State of New Jersey, in his offiicial capacity, and in his individual capacity, Mary Sue Christie, being fictitious wife's name yet known, husband and wife et al., John Does 1-50 and others
Cambonchi v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
as 16-3180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Laurento-Jose Cambonchi
Defendant - Appellee:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee for Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-PA3 and others
Defendant:
Gross Polowy, LLC, Cheddyeh P. Broumand, and all other parties of interest and John and Jane Does, 1-50
Tanvir v. Comey
as 16-1176
Plaintiff:
Awais Sajjad
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Muhammad Tanvir, Jameel Algibhah and Naveed Shinwari
Defendant - Appellee:
"John" Tanzin, Special Agent, FBI, Sanya Garcia, Special Agent FBI, John LNU, Special Agent, FBI and others
Defendant:
Rand Beers, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, John S. Pistole, Administrator, Transportation Security Administration, James Comey, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Berbick v. Does
as 14-3097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clive Berbick and Yolanda Berbick
Defendant:
John Does, 1-50
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, 28 Precinct, Officer Vargas, Spanish Female Cop, 28 precinct arrest and Officer Cardaro, Spanish Female Cop, 28 Precinct arrest
Mitchell v. The City of New York
as 14-767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Melinda Mitchell, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated and Harvey Mitchell, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, a municipal entitty, NYC Police Officer James Schuessler, Shield No. 28718, Richard Roes, 1-50 New York City Police Supervisors and Commanders and others
State of New York v. Solvent Chemical Company, Inc.
as 13-132
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
State of New York
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Olin Corporation, Mader Capital Corp., 3163 Buffalo Avenue Corporation and others
Third-Party-Defendant:
United States of America, Occidental Chemical Corporation, The City of Niagara Falls, New York and others
Defendant:
Recochem
Defendant - Appellee:
Solvent Chemical Company, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company
State of New York v. Solvent Chemical Company, Inc.
as 13-148
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
State of New York
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Mader Capital Corp., 3163 Buffalo Avenue Corporation and Corigan Sanoian, Individually and d/b/a Quad Technologies
Third-Party-Plaintiff - Appellant:
Olin Corporation
Third-Party-Defendant:
United States of America, Occidental Chemical Corporation, The City of Niagara Falls, New York and others
Defendant:
Recochem and E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company
Defendant - Appellee:
Solvent Chemical Company, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
