Cases 21 - 30 of 280
GOULET v. MADERLY LTD. et al
as 2:2021cv00726
Plaintiff:
ALAN GOULET
Defendant:
DOES 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE and MADERLY LTD. doing business as U.S. FILM CREW
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ACKER et al v. MCGOWAN et al
as 5:2021cv02335
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF FREDERICK ACKER, II and ROBERT ACKER
Cross Defendant:
ABC CORP. 1 THROUGH 10, CHARLES MCGOWAN, ROBERT MIKA and others
Cross Claimant:
CAROL MIKA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1 THROUGH #10, NICOLAS TRUCKING CO. INC. and BIENVENIDO RODRIGUEZ OQUENDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOVALEV et al v. CALLAHAN WARD 12TH STREET, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02318
Defendant:
ANTONIO R CUTRUFELLO, CALLAHAN WARD 12TH STREET, LLC, MARCUS W TOCONITA and others
Plaintiff:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Petitioner:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. American Airlines, Inc., et al.
as 2:2021cv01167
Defendant:
AMERICAN AIRLINES INC., DOES 1 THROUGH 10 and AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
Kelly L Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ABRAMSON v. THE LAWSUIT AUTHORITY LLC, et al
as 2:2021cv00275
Defendant:
KWOK DANIEL LTD. LLP, THE LAWSUIT AUTHORITY LLC, and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Plaintiff:
STEWART ABRAMSON
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00029
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00033
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ANSYS, INC. v. ACTOX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv01694
Defendant:
DOES 1 THROUGH 10, AL HATSET and ACTOX CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
ANSYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
