Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Catanzaro v. Rite Aid Corporation, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00524
Plaintiff: David J. Catanzaro
Defendant: Rite Aid Corporation, Inc. and Does 1 Through 50
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Catanzaro v. Bandai America Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00528
Plaintiff: David J. Catanzaro
Defendant: Bandai America Inc. and Does 1 Through 50
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Catanzaro v. Mattel, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00527
Plaintiff: David Catanzaro
Defendant: Mattel, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Target Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
BUSH et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv04549
Plaintiff: LEWIS BUSH , DEE BUSH , DANIELLE BUSH and others
Defendant: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
DEUTSCH v. WELLS FARGO BANK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv03914
Plaintiff: WILMA DEUTSCH
Defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK and DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
LEPRE v. SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2012cv01658
Plaintiff: GERALD S. LEPRE, JR.
Defendant: SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES, SUSAN ADAMEC, DEANA WASKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AHMAD v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD et al
as 2:2009cv02875
Plaintiff: MASOOD AHMAD
Defendant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD and DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Other Statutes None
SHAMIR et al v. AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv76816
Plaintiff: RUTH SHAMIR and MORDECHAI SHAMIR
Defendant: AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., HEWLETT-PACKARD CO. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?