Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mark Darren Walker v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 5:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Walker
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Joseph Hernandez, Orlando Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Medical Malpractice
Mark Darren Walker v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv03113
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Walker
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Lt. Joseph Hernandez, Capt. Orlando Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Medical Malpractice
Nina Tran v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2023cv00681
Plaintiff:
Nina Tran
Defendant:
County of Orange, DOES 1-10 Inclusive, Social Services Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Medical Malpractice
Sandra Santeliz v. Carolina Herrera Ltd. et al
as 2:2023cv00593
Plaintiff:
Sandra Santeliz
Defendant:
Carolina Herrera Ltd., Sociedad Textil Lonia, Corp., Stephanie Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Nicholas Rueda v. Ritmo Latino Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv11145
Defendant:
Ritmo Latino Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, Does 2 through 10, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Rueda
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Christopher L. Tinsman v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv01652
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Tinsman
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Christopher L. Tinsman v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv01765
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Tinsman
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dong v. Various, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv02992
Plaintiff:
Quy Dong
Defendant:
Various, Inc. , FriendFinder Networks Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
