Cases 1 - 10 of 14
B. Williams v. The William Warren Group Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02687
Defendant:
The William Warren Group Inc. a California Corporation individually also known as WWG Team doing business as StorQuest Self Storage, Bill Hobin individually, and in his official capacity as CEO Ownder Principal Mgr. Chairman of the William Warren Group, individually doing business as StorQuest Self Storage also known as William Warren Hobin, StorQuest Self Storage individually a California Corporation also known as WWG Team doing business as StorQuest Self Storage doing business as The William Warren Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
B. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Brian Williams v. City of Hawthorne et al
as 2:2023cv06646
Defendant:
Doe Pabuelo, Doe Espinoza, M.D. Stephan T. Honda and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01486
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
LA Alliance for Human Rights, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 22-55933
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LA ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, an unincorporated association, JOSEPH BURK, HARRY TASHDJIAN and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
LOS ANGELES CATHOLIC WORKER, CANGRESS, DBA Los Angeles Community Action Network, LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity and DOES, 1 through 200 inclusive
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADRIAN MOON, Proposed Intervenor
David Hillman, III et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2022cv06278
Plaintiff:
David Hillman, III, The Estate of David McKnight-Hillman, by and through it's Personal Representative, David Hillman, III and The Estate of David McKnight-Hillman
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Bobby D. Cagle, Virginia Pryor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
LA Alliance for Human Rights, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 22-55687
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LA ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, an unincorporated association, JOSEPH BURK, HARRY TASHDJIAN and others
Intervenor:
LOS ANGELES CATHOLIC WORKER, CANGRESS, DBA Los Angeles Community Action Network, LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity and DOES, 1 through 200 inclusive
LA Alliance for Human Rights et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv02291
Plaintiff:
Charles Van Scoy, Karyn Pinsky, LA Alliance for Human Rights and others
Defendant:
Does 1 through 200, inclusive, City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles and others
Special Master:
James L Smith, Michele Martinez, Hon James L. Smith and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Venice Stakeholders Association, Josue Tiguila and Latino Coalition of Los Angeles
Intervenor:
Cangress, Orange County Catholic Worker, Los Angeles Catholic Worker and others
Interested Party:
Urban Offerings, Inc. and Santee Village Homeowner's Association
Amicus Curiae:
Central City Association of Los Angeles, Committee for Safe Havens, Union Rescue Mission and others
Petitioner:
AIDS Healthcare Foundation and PAUL BORING
Intervenor Defendant:
Adrian D. Moon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sheila Mayfield, et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2019cv01298
Defendant:
Does 1 through 200, inclusive, County of Los Angeles and Stephanie Carpenter
Plaintiff:
Sheila Mayfield and D. C. M.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
