Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07900
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06143
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Najee-Ullah v. Villiage of Riverdale Police Department et al
as 1:2016cv01378
Plaintiff:
Tauheedah Najee-Ullah
Defendant:
Villiage of Riverdale Police Department, Village of Riverdale, IL, David Demik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munshell v. Porter Hospital LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Gillian Munshell
Defendant:
Porter Hospital LLC, Apollo Medical Group LLC, Christian Badillo MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Muhammad, Maryam v. Louis, Beverly et al
as 3:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Maryam E. Muhammad
Defendant:
Beverly Louis, Tom Conrad, Sheila Ashley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VENDLINSKI v. BAKER et al
as 1:2012cv01787
Defendant:
BRUCE R. BAKER and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 5
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY J. VENDLINSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIHM et al v. HANCOCK COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY et al
as 1:2012cv01474
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 5, GREENFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, HANCOCK COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY and others
Plaintiff:
MARY RIHM and RECHO ROWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
French v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2012cv03170
Plaintiff:
Delinda L French
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Illinois State Police Department, Tyler Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shekar v. Kowalczyk et al
as 4:2012cv04049
Plaintiff:
Roger Shekar
Defendant:
Ronald B Kowalczyk, Kathleen Stover, Marylyn Prentice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
