Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Robert H. Law, Inc. v. Woodbine Business Park, Inc.
as 18-542
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Robert H. Law, Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Woodbine Business Park, Inc., Norman Swanson, 224 Harrison Corp. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
D.E. Tarolli, Inc., Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. and National Grid USA
Defendant:
John Doe 1-5, Waite Dairy Inc. and National Grid (US) Holdings, LTD
Red River Specialties, Inc. v. McRight-Flowood Properties, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00895
Plaintiff:
Red River Specialties, Inc.
Defendant:
McRight-Flowood Properties, LLC, McRight Rental Properties, LLC, McRight Family Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Sallet et al v. Saint Mary's Railway West, LLC et al
as 5:2009cv00053
Plaintiff:
Alice Mae Sallet, Myrdes P. Sallett, Archie Lee Sallet and others
Defendant:
Saint Mary's Railway West, LLC, Claudius Strickland and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
TOWNSHIP OF SADDLE BROOK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2009cv02373
Plaintiff:
TOWNSHIP OF SADDLE BROOK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
TOWNSHIP OF SADDLE BROOK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2008cv01917
Plaintiff:
TOWNSHIP OF SADDLE BROOK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Windward Volkswagen, Inc. et al v. Castle Family LLC et al
as 1:2007cv00147
Plaintiff:
Windward Volkswagen, Inc., Windward Volkswagen, Inc. and Windward Volkswagen, Inc.
Defendant:
Castle Family LLC, John Does 1-5, Jane Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
