Cases 41 - 50 of 193
CASALINHO et al v. STRAUB et al
as 2:2021cv05275
Defendant:
JAMES LAWRENCE STRAUB, ABC, INC, I-V, KAG LEASING, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DEBRA CASALINHO and FRANK CASALINHO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
KABABA v. SALAZAR et al
as 2:2021cv01041
Defendant:
JOHN DOES I-V, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP., WILLIAM S JONES and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN E KABABA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv12066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. CALEX EXPRESS et al
as 2:2020cv11196
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant:
CALEX EXPRESS, XYZ COMPANIES I-V, JOHN DOES I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AFFLICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2020cv10610
Defendant:
JOHN DOE I-V, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JANE DOE I-V and others
Plaintiff:
TRECIA AFFLICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BETZ et al v. SPISAK
as 3:2020cv10166
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY P BETZ, BECKY J BETZ, ANTHONY P. BETZ and others
Defendant:
OAKLEY H SPISAK, Does I-V and OAKLEY H. SPISAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAO et al v. STUGYS et al
as 2:2020cv10037
Defendant:
ALGIRDAS STUGYS, RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC., JOHN DOES (I-V) and others
Plaintiff:
PINAKIN RAO, DHRUVI RAO and HIREN RAO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SINGH RADCLIFF v. RADCLIFF et al
as 1:2020cv03669
Defendant:
DR. KRISTEN RADCLIFF, JOHN DOES I-V, COOPER LEVENSON, P.A. and others
Plaintiff:
DR. NINA SINGH RADCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00415
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COLLAZO v. PRIME FLIGHT OF DE, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv21312
Plaintiff:
Dagma Collazo
Defendant:
ANTHONY DORMAN, PRIMEFLIGHT AVIATION SERVICES, INC., PrimeFlight of DE, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
