Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Webster v. Waller et al
as 4:2011cv00111
Plaintiff:
Adrian Webster
Defendant:
Dennis Dolan Waller, E. Lewis, Marcus Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Jackson v. Dolan Waller, et al
as 10-60943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DOLAN WALLER and L WHITING, an officer
Jerry Warner v. Larry Hardy, et al
as 10-60170
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY LEE WARNER
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY HARDY, KENTRELL LIDDELL, M.D., RON WOODALL and others
Paul Evans, Jr. v. Dolan Waller, et al
as 09-60689
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL EVANS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
DOLAN WALLER, WILKINSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Hearron v. Williams et al
as 4:2009cv00033
Plaintiff:
Khristoffer Mandell Hearron
Defendant:
James Williams, Chief Hassell, Raymond Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hearron v. MS Dept Corrections, et al
as 08-61080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KHRISTOFFER MANDELL HEARRON
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DOLAN WALLER, Warden, Wilkinson County Correctional Facility, RAYMOND BYRD, Warden, Delta Correctional Facility and others
Flewellen v. Waller, et al
as 08-60986
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARQUISE LEON FLEWELLEN
Respondent - Appellee:
DOLAN WALLER and STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Jacobs v. Waller, et al
as 08-60230
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD JACKSON JACOBS
Respondent - Appellee:
DOLAN WALLER, WILKINSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Hearron v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2008cv00148
Plaintiff:
Khristoffer Mandell Hearron
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Dolan Waller, Raymond Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gordon v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00071
Plaintiff:
Anthony Douglas Gordon
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Kosta Vlahos, Dolan Waller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
