Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Gomez et al v. Epic Landscape Productions, L.C.
as 2:2022cv02198
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez Gomez, Adrian Margarito Lopez-Arenas, Alfonso Navaez-Uscanga and others
Defendant:
Epic Landscape Productions, Inc., Epic Landscape Prductions and Epic Landscape Productions, L.C.
Dominguez v. Secretary of the Navy
as 5:2021cv03278
Petitioner:
Manuel Dominguez
Respondent:
Secretary of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Yanez-Dominguez v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, The
as 2:2019cv02155
Defendant:
Cincinnati Insurance Company, The and Cincinnati Casualty Company, The
Plaintiff:
Alma R. Yanez-Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dominguez et al v. McLane Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02125
Plaintiff:
Francisco Javier Dominguez
Defendant:
Lonnie Hyde and McLane Food Service Distribution, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States of America v. Fonseca et al
as 6:2013cv01193
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Oscar Fonseca, Noemi Fonseca, Maria A. Fonseca and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Birdsong et al v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, KS et al
as 2:2013cv02090
Plaintiff:
Jerome Birdsong and Rocio Dominguez
Defendant:
Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, KS , P. J. Locke , Travis Toms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dominguez v. Dixon
as 5:2012cv03093
Petitioner:
Benito M. Dominguez
Respondent:
K. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moctezuma-Dominguez v. USA
as 5:2011cv04008
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Abel Moctezuma-Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dominguez v. USA
as 2:2010cv02601
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Benito M. Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
