Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 86
NEWSOM v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2008cv00570
Plaintiff: MICHAEL N. NEWSOM
Defendant: DAVID J. DONAHUE, WENDY KNIGHT and IYC MAIL ROOM STAFF
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Scott v. Donahue et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00206
Plaintiff: Travis Scott
Defendant: David Donahue, Dr Anita Glasson, Dr Eli and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MOFFATT v. MELOY et al
as 1:2008cv00538
Plaintiff: SHELBY G. MOFFATT
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER MELOY, CHAIRMAN OF IND PAROLE BOARD, J. DAVID DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WESTLAKE v. DONAHUE
as 2:2008cv00164
Petitioner: MARK A. WESTLAKE
Respondent: J. DAVID DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMAS et al v. DONAHUE et al
as 2:2008cv00139
Plaintiff: JOHN ERIC THOMAS and UN-NAMED PLAINTIFFS
Defendant: J. DAVID DONAHUE, ALAN FINNAN, BRIAN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS et al v. DONAHUE et al
as 2:2008cv00142
Plaintiff: JOHN E. THOMAS
Defendant: J. DAVID DONAHUE, ALAN FINNAN, BRIAN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAY v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2008cv00464
Plaintiff: KASHMIR L. BRAY
Defendant: DAVID DONAHUE, STANLEY KNIGHT, JAMIE HOUSTON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DAIN et al v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2008cv00440
Plaintiff: JOHN DAIN and JOHN E. THOMAS
Defendant: J. DAVID DONAHUE, ALAN FINNAN, BRIAN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RAMSEY v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2008cv00423
Petitioner: WILLIAM L. RAMSEY
Respondent: J. DAVID DONAHUE, WENDY KNIGHT, CHRISTOPHER E. MELOY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ADAMS v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2008cv00308
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER LEWIS ADAMS
Defendant: DAVID DONAHUE, STANLEY KNIGHT and MAX GAW
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?