Cases 41 - 50 of 86
SMITH v. DONAHUE et al
as 2:2008cv00063
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SMITH
Defendant:
COMM J. DAVID DONAHUE, MICHAEL OSBURN and PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adams v. Donahue et al
as 3:2008cv00078
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lewis Adams
Defendant:
David Donahue, Ed Buss, C Whelan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2008cv00137
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEWIS ADAMS
Defendant:
DAVID DONAHUE, ED BUSS, C. WHELAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DITSWORTH v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2008cv00058
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CARL DITSWORTH
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, COMM J. DAVID DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Falk et al
as 3:2008cv00021
Plaintiff:
Bubba Brown
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, J David Donahue and Ed Buss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Donahue et al
as 3:2007cv00593
Plaintiff:
Trinity Hunter
Defendant:
David J Donahue, Ed Buse, Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. CIRKRIT et al
as 1:2007cv01544
Plaintiff:
OTIS L. THOMAS
Defendant:
STAFF SURGEON, DR. CIRKRIT, RESIDENT DR. KERR, MEDICAL DIRECTOR, ELTON AMOS, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. DONAHUE et al
as 2:2007cv00332
Plaintiff:
TRINITY HUNTER
Defendant:
DAVID J. DONAHUE, ED BUSE, WISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FROSCHAUER v. FINNAN et al
as 2:2007cv00317
Plaintiff:
BARRY I FROSCHAUER
Defendant:
ALAN FINNAN, MITCH DANIELS, J. DAVID DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROLLINGCLOUD v. HANLON et al
as 1:2007cv01411
Petitioner:
KENNETH ROLLINGCLOUD
Respondent:
TOM HANLON, IDOC PAROLE DIVISION, J. DAVID DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
