Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Red Road Incorporated, et al. v. Hunter, et al.
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Red Road Incorporated and Donald G Loper
Defendant:
US Attorney Andrew Hunter, Attorney Missoula Br Jennifer T. Newbold, Peter J Smith, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 631 Small Business Act
Castro v. McGrane, et al.
as 1:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Castro
Defendant:
Secretary of State Phil McGrane and Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 1:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keefer v. USA
as 3:2023cv00382
Petitioner:
Donald Randall Keefer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brink v. Parhiz
as 1:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Donald Brink
Defendant:
Dr. Terab Parhiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Jackson Service Station
as 1:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Ty Donald Bradford
Defendant:
Jackson Service Station
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Donald Phelps
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Office of attorney general, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seefeld(t) v. Gee et al
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Payton Shawn Seefeld(t)
Defendant:
David Gee, Govenor Brad Little, Donald J Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Snyder v. Robinson, et al.
as 2:2021cv00328
Plaintiff:
James Franklin Snyder
Defendant:
Katlin Lynn Robinson, Brandon Colt Bowcut, Donald Lamar Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Weikert v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00290
Plaintiff:
Donald Weikert
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
