Cases 1 - 10 of 1,356
Whittaker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02716
Plaintiff:
Donald Whittaker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Church, IV v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02681
Plaintiff:
Donald Church, IV
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Beeler v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02461
Plaintiff:
Donald Beeler
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doe (T.B.) v. Red Roof Inns Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02420
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (T.B.)
Defendant:
Red Roof Inns Inc, RRF Holding Company LLC, Red Roof Franchising LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Runkle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02344
Plaintiff:
Donald Runkle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith and Smurk
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillow v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65325
Plaintiff:
Donald F Dillow
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Giddings v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01880
Plaintiff:
Donald Giddings
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Watkins v. Biden et al
as 2:2024cv01809
Plaintiff:
Patricia Watkins
Defendant:
Joe Biden and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
