Cases 1 - 10 of 23
MARSH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21284
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS MARSH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17052
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AmGUARD Insurance Company v. Schulman et al
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
AmGUARD Insurance Company
Defendant:
Donald Lewis Schulman doing business as Donald Schulman Wrecker Service, Donald Lewis Schulman, Donald Shane Schulman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
MARSH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv88253
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS MARSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv10541
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv57998
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SYKES v. JONES et al
as 4:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS SYKES
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, DAREL CHERRY, GREG ARCHIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sykes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2017cv00089
Plaintiff:
Donald Lewis Sykes
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Donald Sykes
as 15-15143
Petitioner:
In re: DONALD LEWIS SYKES
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Donald Sykes v. Warden, et al
as 15-14994
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD LEWIS SYKES
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and WALTER A. MCNEIL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
