Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Carty v. Pennsylvania Parole Board et al
as 1:2024cv00733
Petitioner:
Donald Charles Carty
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Parole Board and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schwartz Foundation et al v. Schwartz
as 3:2023cv06086
Plaintiff:
Schwartz Foundation, Donald Charles Schwartz, Willie L. Brown, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Margot D Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Crosby v. Neff
as 1:2023cv01363
Plaintiff:
Curtis Charles Crosby
Defendant:
Donald Charles Neff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
GLARDON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10751
Plaintiff:
DONALD CHARLES GLARDON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 6:2023cv00109
Petitioner:
Donald Charles Anderson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18828
Plaintiff:
DONALD CHARLES JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nichols v. VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor
as 3:2022cv11971
Plaintiff:
Donald Charles Nichols
Defendant:
VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor
Donald Schwartz, et al v. Bank of New York MellonIn re: Donald Schwartz, et al v. Bank of New York Mellon
as 22-15201
Debtor:
In the Matter of: DONALD CHARLES SCHWARTZ
Appellant:
DONALD CHARLES SCHWARTZ
Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA Bank of New York
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv47863
Plaintiff:
DONALD CHARLES MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker v. Saul
as 2:2021cv01156
Plaintiff:
Donald Charles Parker
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
