Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jordy Ochoa v. L. Thomas, et al
as 21-55906
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORDY EZEQUIEL OCHOA, AKA Jordy Ochoa, AKA Jordy Ezequil Ochoa-Cordova
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN L. R. THOMAS, Metroplitan Detention Center, Los Angeles, California and DONALD H. BLEVINS
Barquero v. Obama et al
as 3:2016cv01293
Plaintiff:
Amilcar Barquero
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Eric H. Holder , Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barquero v. Obama et al
as 3:2015cv00562
Plaintiff:
Amilcar Barquero
Defendant:
Barack Obama , Edmund G. Brown, Jr, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert A Peete v. Mark S Arnold et al
as 2:2013cv01877
Defendant:
Mark S Arnold, Donald H Blevins, Steve Cooley and others
Plaintiff:
Robert A Peete
Bruce Westin v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 12-56666
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRUCE WESTIN
Respondent - Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General and DONALD H. BLEVINS
Roger Giani v. Donald Blevin
as 12-55961
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER GIANI
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD H. BLEVINS, Chief Probation Officer, Los Angeles County
Real-party-in-interest:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Bruce Westin v. Kamala D Harris et al
as 2:2011cv10651
Respondent:
Donald H. Blevins and Kamala D Harris
Petitioner:
Bruce Westin
Roger Giani v. Donald H. Blevins
as 2:2011cv03556
Respondent:
Donald H. Blevins
Petitioner:
Roger Giani
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
People of the State of California
Salvatore Partick Osio v. Donald H. Blevins
as 2:2010cv06897
Respondent:
Donald H. Blevins
Petitioner:
Salvatore Patrick Osio
Suon et al v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2007cv01770
Plaintiff:
Lisa Suon, Jeffrey Pay and Andy Mean
Defendant:
County of Alameda, Alameda County Probation Department, Alameda County Chief Probation Officer Donald H. Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
