Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Peoples v. Posey et al
as 2:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
Administrator Ashli Peoples and Ashli Peoples
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Brett L. Posey, James C Webb, Corrections Officer Spencer A Sappington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Glaze v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allah v. Chambers Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
El-Barseem K. Allah
Defendant:
Annette Chambers Smith, Ron Erdos, L. Mahlman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Cool et al
as 2:2021cv05146
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown
Defendant:
William Cool, Travis Raypool, Dane Osbourne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huffman v. Pairan
as 2:2021cv03611
Defendant:
Ronald Morgan, Donald Morgan and Chaplain Pairan
Plaintiff:
David Warren Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copeland v. Morgan
as 1:2020cv01600
Petitioner:
James Copeland
Respondent:
Warden Donald Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ted Palladeno v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 20-3587
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN JONES, BRIAN WITTRUP, ROGER WILSON and others
Interested Party:
STATE OF OHIO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TED PALLADENO
Waddell v. Gormley et al
as 2:2020cv00706
Plaintiff:
Dennis Jerome Waddell
Defendant:
Jeffrey Howard, David Gormley and Donald Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren K. Henness, et al v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 19-3064
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE DEWINE, Governor, State of Ohio, UNKNOWN PHARMACIES, CHRISTOPHER LAROSE and others
Other:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN K. HENNESS
Palladeno v. Mohr et al
as 3:2018cv01352
Plaintiff:
Ted Palladeno
Defendant:
Gary C Mohr, Roger Wilson, Robert Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
